This tournament was essentially brought in to appease a couple clubs, which it did.
SUFC and Olympic clearly demonstrated they did not give two hoots about this comp, which was disgraceful, but hopefully this changes for next season. The other clubs all did commendable jobs.
How do we define success of this season, absolutely no idea. The fact there was more football in this country as a result of this tournament is a success in itself.
Attendances - overall, considering what we were looking at round 1, I think the drop of was concerning considering each team only had 3 home games. What would happen with a full home and away season? The people who were making excuses for poor crowds were the same people blasting the aleague crowds with the exact same excuses.
Financially - I have already heard several clubs were really struggling, albeit it would not be a surprise for the non foundation clubs to struggle.
People were complaining about the the kick off times, what about the 8pm kick offs on the cold wet freezing miserable nights in the winter? Souths wet home game already demonstrated what an effect rain has on attendances. So do we have this comp in winter, or align with the Aleague if the aim is to "maximise attendances"?
Would be interesting to hear what SBS thought of season 1.
I think we need to bite the bullet and just go with a full home and away season, even if it is just 8 teams start off with, however if we cannot even find 8 financially viable teams for the time being, then we need to reset and find a alternate solution.
Realistically, only Marconi, Hellas, Preston, Wolves and APIA looked like they were ready and keen for a second division. South Hobart definately has potential but would imagine it would be extremely difficult to attract players down there.