- Joined
- Aug 31, 2025
- Replies
- 6,573
- Thread Author
- #41
Sydney FC is essentially their NSWNPL team against Tottenham this evening.
Still 0–0 in the HSF Derby.
- HonestSpursFan
- Replies: 21
- Forum: A-League
By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.
Sign Up Now!Sydney FC is essentially their NSWNPL team against Tottenham this evening.
A bit more than the NSWNPL team!Sydney FC is essentially their NSWNPL team against Tottenham this evening.
1-1 then Tottenham won on penaltiesWot was the score?
Looks like the punters are getting wise to these overpriced training games and voting with their feet.Just watched the highlights, I don't get it, Auckland get a great crowd of 40k+ and looking at tonight's game SFC only get around 15k if that, so many empty seats.
I don’t think the RBB boycotted the game.WSW got 25K - wouldn’t ticks be the same similar price
I don’t think the RBB boycotted the game.
marketing marketing #101How anybody can pay that money to watch people training is beyond me. Real games or nothing for me these days.
I get your point. What else I should have said is, that a few years back, these games were drawing 70,000 + crowds, but no more as witnessed over the past two nights.marketing marketing #101
Glad I could watch on tv for far less - takes all types as they say.
Mind you Sutho in saying that many waste far more on gambling/smokes etc and it gave your team a badge of honour how much they competed in a training run and lost by pens - the development league is flourishing.
It's a bit of fun, imagine how buzzed both teams will be, WSW scoring multiple goals and taking it to the wire till the 80th minute, SFC taking Tottenham to a draw.I'm not falling for these anymore. Nothing really happens
fair enough.I get your point. What else I should have said is, that a few years back, these games were drawing 70,000 + crowds, but no more as witnessed over the past two nights.
It's Chelsea and Spurs - what about a big club!!fair enough.
More than few years ago I reckon and seriously it is a crying shame maybe sign of the times as well ?
So much football is at your finger tips and there's a lot of contributing changing factors happenning.
We just went through the longest WC in history.
I say this with no malice but a football devotee who does wish the very best here.
APL - no matter the past and currrent probs something is a miss when the westies could grab 25K (should also have been more) whereas the no1 avg crowd puller struggled to get 15k.
Admittedly some would say Chelsea has a better pull due to their win history than Spurs yet Spurs brought a far better line up.
Why didn't the many "event" goers that normally boost your crowds not turn up.
Put the cost aside, event goers happily pay over $100 for other random BS.
The devottee viewer similar to me having no interest in SFC hurts avg's.
For the younger brigade - long before AL/APL, we'd all be at touring games.
eg FNSW would pick a best squad representing NSW from all the clubs v Wolves - so be it Chelsea/Spurs.
All these games used to be packed house's, the Sydney Sport Ground as it was known from memory.
Maybe they should looking at it that way - have a mix of players from all the clubs therefore the interest spreads across all your Sydney APL clubs incl CCM.
Being they made it a Festival round robin of 4 - could have NSW East NSW West plus the 2 visiting clubs.
May spread the interest and brew up some derby rivarly type of marketing speil.
Sorry, but your last two paragraphs are just Yankee bullshit, similar to " all stars".fair enough.
More than few years ago I reckon and seriously it is a crying shame maybe sign of the times as well ?
So much football is at your finger tips and there's a lot of contributing changing factors happenning.
We just went through the longest WC in history.
I say this with no malice but a football devotee who does wish the very best here.
APL - no matter the past and currrent probs something is a miss when the westies could grab 25K (should also have been more) whereas the no1 avg crowd puller struggled to get 15k.
Admittedly some would say Chelsea has a better pull due to their win history than Spurs yet Spurs brought a far better line up.
Why didn't the many "event" goers that normally boost your crowds not turn up.
Put the cost aside, event goers happily pay over $100 for other random BS.
The devottee viewer similar to me having no interest in SFC hurts avg's.
For the younger brigade - long before AL/APL, we'd all be at touring games.
eg FNSW would pick a best squad representing NSW from all the clubs v Wolves - so be it Chelsea/Spurs.
All these games used to be packed house's, the Sydney Sport Ground as it was known from memory.
Maybe they should looking at it that way - have a mix of players from all the clubs therefore the interest spreads across all your Sydney APL clubs incl CCM.
Being they made it a Festival round robin of 4 - could have NSW East NSW West plus the 2 visiting clubs.
May spread the interest and brew up some derby rivarly type of marketing speil.
In the landscape of Australian football, these are ginormous football clubs.It's Chelsea and Spurs - what about a big club!!
I get you but this is what the event goers go and the new dawners.Sorry, but your last two paragraphs are just Yankee bullshit, similar to " all stars".
I have only ever been to one all-stars game (hardly any stars to be fair) and that was the official opening of the Olympic stadium, and what a snooze feast that was for $132 in 1999. I vowed, never again.
In the landscape of Australian football, these are ginormous football clubs.