- Joined
- Oct 17, 2024
- Replies
- 12,788
Cheers, that makes the NON red for Messi even more suss then.VAR can look into any incident if they think it warrants a red - doesn't need an initial decision for/against it
By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.
Sign Up Now!Cheers, that makes the NON red for Messi even more suss then.VAR can look into any incident if they think it warrants a red - doesn't need an initial decision for/against it
I'll give them credit for winning, old man Lukaku is a true leader for them. I'll happily get on that bandwagon.I can't believe I have to support Belgium in the next round.
Balogun red card: I think this is one of those 'orange' card situations. I certainly didn't think it was a stonewall red card on the VAR replays (basically same thinking as @Beretta said) HOWEVER (see what I did there) it's a situation now where because this was overturned and given a Red Card, it begs the question on why quite a few other decisions haven't led to the same outcome throughout the tournament (such as Messi against Saudi Arabia, and whoever the Yank was that got Metcalfe) that seemed nearly identical to this situation. In honesty, looking at it again, I think it's more the ankle bit that gives the red card than the rake across the back of the calf.
these refs are fucking up the knockout rounds with these terrible decisions.
that is not a red card, pure accident, he wasn't even looking at the player.
Was the net pulled down?Say it with me:
The most dangerous lead…
It was as clear a red as you could ever see. He nearly snapped the guy’s ankle in half with his studs. Since when is that kind of contact not reckless and dangerous?these refs are fucking up the knockout rounds with these terrible decisions.
that is not a red card, pure accident, he wasn't even looking at the player.
The red card was as stonewall as it gets. I really can’t believe there’s any controversy about it. I thought it was just the idiot Americans questioning it.Ok time to put my eyes to the 3 main things to discuss today:
- England non-penalty: Correct decision. Someone said it earlier explaining the feet giving it away. But, I'll have a little bit more to say on this because...
- Belgium penalty: Wrong decision, I honestly can't even see the proper contact in that. In saying that - as this was given by VAR, I'm now surprised the England one wasn't given earlier.
- Balogun red card: I think this is one of those 'orange' card situations. I certainly didn't think it was a stonewall red card on the VAR replays (basically same thinking as @Beretta said) HOWEVER (see what I did there) it's a situation now where because this was overturned and given a Red Card, it begs the question on why quite a few other decisions haven't led to the same outcome throughout the tournament (such as Messi against Saudi Arabia, and whoever the Yank was that got Metcalfe) that seemed nearly identical to this situation. In honesty, looking at it again, I think it's more the ankle bit that gives the red card than the rake across the back of the calf.