Welcome!

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.

Sign Up Now!

World news and politics.


Taking on Hezbollah wont be as easy as rolling their little brother Hamas.

Although with Iran now facing an existential threat in terms of their supply lines to their various terrorist proxies around the region.

Here Reuters are reporting some of Irans other shi'te terrorist proxies are turning away from the regime in Tehran....

 
See this is typical of political discourse right now, how do you know what immigrants I like or don't. Dutch and French are pretty trying though. Also check Quickys' English for mistakes while you're attempting to have a go. Greenys always hunt in packs, I get that, and it doesn't bother me in the least. Give it your best shot
Yeah, looks like it doesn’t bother you 😂
 
It will be interesting to see how many drones Iran have.

Soon the gulf states will not have the resources to intercept the and will only use air defence for ballistic missiles and take the hits. Damage control.

It takes at least 3 defensive missiles to stop one attack. They are churning through resources.

If it keeps up drones will hit gulf states without any defence.
 
It will be interesting to see how many drones Iran have.

Soon the gulf states will not have the resources to intercept the and will only use air defence for ballistic missiles and take the hits. Damage control.

It takes at least 3 defensive missiles to stop one attack. They are churning through resources.

If it keeps up drones will hit gulf states without any defence.

I would argue that having a highly effective system of drone capability is the single biggest advantage of any warzone at the minute.

Drones introduce a different statistical pressure:

Slower, but cheaper.

Launched in waves.

Designed to exhaust air defences over hours rather than minutes.

If ballistic missiles are the shock factor, drones are the attrition factor. And perhaps those are the scariest capability of Iran. Production cost is minor in comparison to the cost for its destruction. For example: Shahed-136 drone: $20,000 – $50,000; More sophisticated attack drones: $50,000 – $200,000.

A single wave of 100 drones might cost an attacker around, $2–5 million. But if defenders intercept those drones using Patriot missiles, the defensive bill could reach $300–400 million. Even cheaper systems like Iron Dome still create a financial imbalance if large numbers of drones are launched simultaneously.

Underground “missile cities”

Iran’s survivability matters as much as its inventory.

Its missile infrastructure includes:

Hardened underground tunnels
Concealed storage depots
Protected launch sites
The statistical question here is not how many missiles Iran has, but how many survive first-wave strikes. If survivability is high, the conflict shifts from a short exchange to prolonged attrition. Iran does not need to formally blockade the Strait of Hormuz to make an impact.

Through:

Anti-ship missiles

Naval mines

Fast attack craft

Drone harassment

It can disrupt shipping enough to:

Raise insurance costs

Divert vessels

Spike energy prices

Already, tanker traffic hesitations and suspended crossings show that economic pressure can escalate faster than battlefield outcomes. In war calculus, this is force multiplication without direct engagement.
 
20260307_DE_US.jpg


Yep....
 
I would argue that having a highly effective system of drone capability is the single biggest advantage of any warzone at the minute.
I totally agree with this. At the start of the Ukraine conflict it was our drones they were using manufactured in QLD. I think we'd be better off defensively if we focussed on deterrents like drone capabilities including submersible drones. Our standing army isn't large enough to go blow-for-blow in a conflict. We need to fight smarter with technology.
 
This is probably a terribly unpopular opinion but I think we also need a nuclear deterrent medium to long term. I think we've surreptitiously positioned ourselves for that. We have a research reactor for nuclear medicine, missile technology, the manufacturing capability, access to uranium, the scientists. We could acquire them if needed.
 
I totally agree with this. At the start of the Ukraine conflict it was our drones they were using manufactured in QLD. I think we'd be better off defensively if we focussed on deterrents like drone capabilities including submersible drones. Our standing army isn't large enough to go blow-for-blow in a conflict. We need to fight smarter with technology.
80% of russian casualties now are with drones
 
80% of russian casualties now are with drones
That's wild. It's what we need. I reckon it'd be a nightmare trying to take Australia if we had drones. We're so isolated and large. Supply chains would be stretched. It would already be difficult.
 
That's wild. It's what we need. I reckon it'd be a nightmare trying to take Australia if we had drones. We're so isolated and large. Supply chains would be stretched. It would already be difficult.
The best bit would be the nanny state councils issuing fines for drone flying 😅😂
 
The best bit would be the nanny state councils issuing fines for drone flying 😅😂
I fly drones for work and I have seen some dumb shit from amateur drone pilots. My personal favourite was someone who was hovering in position in the approach to the runway of a major airport. Well within the no fly zone. Very dangerous.
 
I fly drones for work and I have seen some dumb shit from amateur drone pilots. My personal favourite was someone who was hovering in position in the approach to the runway of a major airport. Well within the no fly zone. Very dangerous.
A dude once flew a drone into a park into my mate’s baby.

Did not end well for drone guy.
 
drones will be the next catapult, they're easy pickings for an AI

Yep, AI warfare is the more likely story here.

AI flying attack drones versus AI defending against AI attack drones, with AI counter-attack drones and so on.....

Whoever has the best AI? 👌
 

Saudi Arabia intercepts more drones
The Saudi Defence Ministry says its forces have intercepted seven drones east of the capital, Riyadh, in the past hour.

The announcement came an hour after it said it had downed eight other drones that had entered the kingdom’s airspace.

As we’ve been reporting, Iranian President Masoud Pezesjkian said earlier that neighbouring countries will no longer be targeted unless an attack originates from their territory. But Iran was hit with attacks shortly afterwards, triggering retaliatory assaults.
 
They have tried Pan-Arabism, Pan-Islamism, shit some countries even recently let their women vote and drive....

The only thing thats gonna unite them all is a 170km long car free city in the desert :)

Just as an aside... They've pulled the pin on the Line.


My favourite comments on the video are:

* I'm an idiot and even I knew this was always going to be the outcome.
* The Line has been shortened so much it is now called The Dot.
 
Just as an aside... They've pulled the pin on the Line.


My favourite comments on the video are:

* I'm an idiot and even I knew this was always going to be the outcome.
* The Line has been shortened so much it is now called The Dot.

Are they still playing the 2030 WC final in the death trap in the sky?
 
Back
Top