NicCarBel
Club Veteran
- Joined
- Oct 17, 2024
- Replies
- 2,989
Just not in Gungahlin... hahahahahaIm sorry I wasn't trying to be mean.... but there are clubs in ACT that DO have money... is more my point.
By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.
Sign Up Now!Just not in Gungahlin... hahahahahaIm sorry I wasn't trying to be mean.... but there are clubs in ACT that DO have money... is more my point.
but the exisitng Aleague model IS the only thing holding back pro/rel in this country.Spot on! Essentially, the owners who ponied up early in the MLS now get to 'profit' from the new owners buying into the scheme. They have the population and (more importantly) the spread of population centres for this to be sustainable, assuming billionaires continue to use sporting franchises as badges of honour.
But we don't have that franchise culture here that has become so deeply ingrained over there. Teams need to be financially viable, not necessarily profitable, in that owners are contributing capital at a level they are happy with. It seems that since peak A-League around 2017/18 (and accelerated with COVID), many owners have been trying to cut costs to limit losses. Getting a $30 million injection every now and then is not a sustainable business model.
100% agree. I think now, more so than any time prior, the A-League club owners recognise the model is flawed. They may well still be trapped in the sunk-cost fallacy, and see clubs being admitted to the league via promotion and not franchise fees as unfair. But ultimately, they're just guaranteeing themselves ongoing losses year after year.but the exisitng Aleague model IS the only thing holding back pro/rel in this country.
THE ONLY THING HOLDING BACK PRO/REL IN THIS COUNTRY.
Stu I sincerely hope you are right but listening to Rugari doesn't give me ANY confidence that the APL is thinking this.... Nor that they will ever.100% agree. I think now, more so than any time prior, the A-League club owners recognise the model is flawed. They may well still be trapped in the sunk-cost fallacy, and see clubs being admitted to the league via promotion and not franchise fees as unfair. But ultimately, they're just guaranteeing themselves ongoing losses year after year.
The optimist in me thinks the owners recognise that supporting the progression to a proper footballing pyramid (with some grandfathered clauses in it to protect some of their interests/investment) can help drive stronger long-term interest in the league.
I did say I was an optimistStu I sincerely hope you are right but listening to Rugari doesn't give me ANY confidence that the APL is thinking this.... Nor that they will ever.
Sorry mate, in advance, Im a purist Im not interested in appeasing ANY gatekeepers.I did say I was an optimistI will have to watch the video with Rugari to perhaps temper my hopes.
Having said that, my thinking isn't they're agreeable to a full P&R system down to Victorian State League Division 5 West. More like a system that enables the teams that show they have the ambition and ability (both sporting and non-sporting) to sustainably compete at the national level to do so. I have a lengthy post drafted up on a system that I think could be agreeable to all the various stakeholder groups, that I will share soon. It's not the system I'd like to see implemented, but just one that I think works to satisfy the gatekeepers.
Indeed with the exception of england p and r to the top division predates professionalization of the top division in 12 countries i had a look atSmall correction he said "P&R is a solution to the problem of having too many PROFESSIONAL clubs" which must explain why P&R exists all throughout the known football universe.... the bloke is an AFL muppet, ...
You do realise Rugari is just a journalist right?Stu I sincerely hope you are right but listening to Rugari doesn't give me ANY confidence that the APL is thinking this.... Nor that they will ever.
True but there’s way more money in the women’s game now.I doubt it. They were quite successful early on. I'm pretty sure historically, they are one of the most successful ALW teams.
Last I’ve read or heard it was struggling g big time and women looking asking making a stand for better salaries also.True but there’s way more money in the women’s game now.
I think it's a little of column a and a little of column b - but that's just me speculatingLast I’ve read or heard it was struggling g big time and women looking asking making a stand for better salaries also.
Please enlighten me if I’m mistaken
It’s struggling because the league isn’t fully professional yet. The popularity is higher than ever.Last I’ve read or heard it was struggling g big time and women looking asking making a stand for better salaries also.
Please enlighten me if I’m mistaken
Women’s game is popular no doubt but in regards to the W league they the registered local players families etc are not turning up to their games much.It’s struggling because the league isn’t fully professional yet. The popularity is higher than ever.
I don’t think all of a sudden it’s gets full Pro suddenly makes success and good crowds.It’s struggling because the league isn’t fully professional yet. The popularity is higher than ever.
Unfortunately it will continue to struggle for at least the next couple of years because the timeframe given by the PFA to have full-time professionalisation of the A-League Women by the start of next season is unsustainable and they won't be able to implement it until much later down the line.It’s struggling because the league isn’t fully professional yet. The popularity is higher than ever.
Paid mouthpiece for the APL you mean! Lets not hide from the facts!You do realise Rugari is just a journalist right?
Nooooo, bc as we are all aware, his 'noble morality & the remowned journalistic integrity' blocks him from multiple streams!I see. So Nine-Fairfax = APL. Got it now