Welcome!

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.

Sign Up Now!

NPL 2026

NicCarBel said:
100%

I have to find the post, I'm sure it's here somewhere. But I found it interesting the way they worded ANU not being included in NPL this year, and then changed it a day later..
Click to expand...

You could also say the same for UC although they aren't nearly as successful as ANU. Maybe one can partner with Radford and the other with Marist. Both of them have played the highest level before as well. Tom Rogic was literally running around for ANU not that long ago.
 
HappyGuus said:
Yikes, Canberra Croatia removed from top spot after a points deduction!

The top two play each other this weekend in the national match of the round (according to me). It also opens the door again for Tigers in third spot to jump them both, although unlikely, they do play second bottom Brindabella already with -39 GD.

View attachment 8862

Click to expand...

Their matchup with Monaro this weekend was likely to be zero sum anyway given both have one draw this season.
However, needing now the win will only add to the intensity…
 
NicCarBel said:
My theory is that - after Gungahlin folded and it threatened the NPL having 10 teams this season, Juventus caught whift (i don't know how you're supposed to spell that in context) that White Eagles were getting the new 10th spot and argued with Capital Football that they had already put in place - or began a big chunk of it - what Capital Football doubted Juventus could do in 12 months in the space of 2-3 months, and essentially forced CF to put them in because they had finished above White Eagles (because White Eagles exemption was given while Juventus' was initially denied - despite neither being in the top 3 'exemption adjusted' spots in the CPL last year. I did note that when CF announced White Eagles and Juventus being added, that White Eagles had a full statement post on social media with graphics, etc ready within 15mins after the announcement was made, but Juventus didn't have anything until the next day.

The exemptions given to these 3 made it clear that they had to have a full set up in the Junior League ready to go for 2027
Click to expand...
Ah I stand corrected.. so because they don't have yoof teams they don't have to adhere to the U23 rule?

Not counting the keeper is weird, like I know why they do it because it would be an easy cheat just to have the reserves keeper play up every week on the bench but is that written in the rules somewhere that keepers don't count?
 
Dinamo said:
You could also say the same for UC although they aren't nearly as successful as ANU. Maybe one can partner with Radford and the other with Marist. Both of them have played the highest level before as well. Tom Rogic was literally running around for ANU not that long ago.
Click to expand...
UC and Radford would make sense given they are across the road from eachother.

I have to see if ANU have like parter colleges in the city, like UC does (which Radford is not one of them, but still)
New Horizon said:
Their matchup with Monaro this weekend was likely to be zero sum anyway given both have one draw this season but needing to win will only make it more intense…
Click to expand...
Not many draws across the league this season. But I wonder if Monaro will be playing for one this week given the updates.
 
No Totti No Party said:
Ah I stand corrected.. so because they don't have yoof teams they don't have to adhere to the U23 rule?

Not counting the keeper is weird, like I know why they do it because it would be an easy cheat just to have the reserves keeper play up every week on the bench but is that written in the rules somewhere that keepers don't count?
Click to expand...

From Football Australia.

NPL Rules.png
 
No Totti No Party said:
Ah I stand corrected.. so because they don't have yoof teams they don't have to adhere to the U23 rule?
Click to expand...
That's my take on it now having read and remembered a couple things
No Totti No Party said:
Not counting the keeper is weird, like I know why they do it because it would be an easy cheat just to have the reserves keeper play up every week on the bench but is that written in the rules somewhere that keepers don't count?
Click to expand...
yep
1786682441694.png
And now I've just found the 'exemption' by just looking up a couple lines from where I looked before. There's no other info on these 'exemptions' in the Regulations, so I would assume this is the exemptions announced last year with the declarations for Juventus, Queanbeyan and White Eagles.
 
NPL Queensland Final Day results:
Brisbane Roar 1 Gold Coast Knights 2
Gold Coast United 2 Eastern Suburbs 0
Moreton City Excelsior 0 Lions FC 2
Olympic FC 1 Rochedale Rovers 2
Peninsula Power 2 Brisbane City 2
Wynnum Wolves 0 Magic United 3

Week one finals schedule – August 28/29/30,
Lions FC v Peninsula Power at Luxury Paints Stadium (winner straight into the grand final, loser into preliminary final)
Moreton City Excelsior v Gold Coast Knights at Wolter Park (winner into preliminary final, loser knocked out)
 
SMFC1959 said:
That means Preston has 5 matches in 13 days !

Aug 16 - Dandenong Thunder
Aug 19 - Melbourne City Youth
Aug 22 - Dandenong City
Aug 26 - South Melbourne (Australia Cup)
Aug 29 - Altona Magic
Click to expand...
All because of that ridiculous rule that if an academy has 5 players called up for international duty they can postpone a game.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top