Welcome!

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.

Sign Up Now!

FIFA WC 26 - Other Nations LIVE Match Thread ⚽

I understand the reactive behaviour is an issue today - I don't mind the booing etc but the blatant ref/lino abuse is OTT but yer that expecting a massive cultural change that I feel difficult to happen.
Mind you VAR hasn't changed that behaviour much in any case.
I'm in the what goes around comes around - not every time but karma does/has happened.

The officials still cop it on the field - the VAR fellas are lucky locked up in the nose bleed stands in safety, plus I suspect seco's are nearby as well.

Do you really think ref's make the final decisions these days? lol.
 
Do you really think ref's make the final decisions these days? lol.
Generally speaking going back to the pre VAR days league wise yes, at modern days world cups I don't know what to believe any more.
I'd like to believe for the best but yer today is such a shonky world money talks.
 
The issue with placing so much reliance on technology is that you can get both false positives and false negatives. You also have to factor in the ingrained bias and how certain teams always seem to get a disproportionate amount of favourable calls. That's why you end up with situations where VAR takes 5 minutes on some granular issue while Messi goes studs up on someone's calf and VAR does not dare to intervene.
 
The issue with placing so much reliance on technology is that you can get both false positives and false negatives. You also have to factor in the ingrained bias and how certain teams always seem to get a disproportionate amount of favourable calls. That's why you end up with situations where VAR takes 5 minutes on some granular issue while Messi goes studs up on someone's calf and VAR does not dare to intervene.
It certainly doesn't pass the pub test eh?
 
If we are looking at the slightest touch, that touched a hair based on some sensor. Which no one has been able to show on a camera.

Come on man. That's not clear and obvious.

The goal in the 113/114 min - you do realise Portugal scored in 94, by the time it restarts it easily 3-4 mins and all the checks that are done.
Not sure what game you play but 3-4 mins added on for a goal, so if you score 5 goals in 2nd half, you play 15-20 mins more, na dont think so.
Its 90 seconds tops.
 
Apparently the rule is the touch needs to be intentional.
Wouldn't Veiga's touch have needed to be intentional for it to be called onside? I think....I don't know. These new technologies are forcing questions about the rule I haven't thought about in years
Correct - it’s what I flagged before
 
Switzerland accounted for Algeria 2-0 and did it mainly in first gear.Xhaka is such a top all round footballer with that touch of mongrel which makes him such a difficult opponent.Manzambi one of the best young players in the tournament.
Switzerland got the job done 2-0 over Algeria in their World Cup round of 32 game and will play the winner of Colombia's match against Ghana in the round of 16.
 
Just watched the highlights of croatia v portugal

Looked a heck of a game

The penalty reminded me of the 50 rugby tackles viduka faced in the 2006 game

The off side goal also reminded me of kewells off side goal, tho this one needed snicko

Game just needed a keeper howler and a goal ruled out because the referee calls full time
 
Just watched the highlights of croatia v portugal

Looked a heck of a game

The penalty reminded me of the 50 rugby tackles viduka faced in the 2006 game

The off side goal also reminded me of kewells off side goal, tho this one needed snicko

Game just needed a keeper howler and a goal ruled out because the referee calls full time
Was thinking of exactly those examples watching this haha
 
Back
Top