By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.
Sign Up Now!The most extreme are a separate group while the vast majority of socialists do campaign for seizure of wealth of those who worked for it.Yeah you're starting to sound like sharkboy.
And you didn't. Here's what you said.
The issue is that socialists come in, don't want to do or create any of the wealth themselves and will just pick it off from those who have. The most extreme versions will just kill the different thinkers off.
There's no spectrum here according to you. They're all deadshits and the worst of them want to kill everyone.
I think the word 'version' clearly indicates there's a spectrum while mentioning most people have middle ground on sustainable welfare systems demonstrates there are numerous ways of looking at it.You didn't, go back and look at my edited post.
The most extreme are a separate group while the vast majority of socialists do campaign for seizure of wealth of those who worked for it.
The working population are a much easier target once the wealthy pack up and leave.
Post of the year. Gold medal for you.I referred to the spectrum. Most people don't see welfare programs as an issue. It's the resistance against those who state the assets of those who worked fair and hard for it should be seized only to serve their own wicked fantasies of how to run the world.
The vast majority of people can see the positive middle ground. It's these nose ring, blue haired socialist pigs that want to live off the labour of others that most take issue with.
I'm referring to those with rabid campaigns that will first try to tax the ultra wealthy. When that doesn't work they'll look for the easy target of the working class and the assets they've built. It becomes grossly unfair very quickly.Ugh. You speak in such extremes.
'We should try to reduce wealth disparity'
'We should perhaps reduce capital gains tax and negative gearing rorts'
'We should maybe think about raising taxes to help pay for services and restore the budget deficit'
JS96
'the vast majority of socialists do campaign for seizure of wealth of those who worked for it.'
Sounds like the average blue haired, nose ring wearing Reddit user.I'm referring to those with rabid campaigns that will first try to tax the ultra wealthy. When that doesn't work they'll look for the easy target of the working class and the assets they've built. It becomes grossly unfair very quickly.
You wouldn't become a billionaire because the socialist wouldn't have money to pay you. That is unless they stole from someone else or just borrowed with the intention of never repaying it.Cute how you still name drop me when I've deliberately ignored your rubbish for a while.
The fact I live in your head rent free I could be a billionaire if I charged you for it.
Sounds about right for that bloke.You wouldn't become a billionaire because the socialist wouldn't have money to pay you. That is unless they stole from someone else or just borrowed with the intention of never repaying it.
I think we can all agree on here that there are positive social programs that have been done sustainably and correctly. We know the plaudits of the Nordic model.Sounds like the average blue haired, nose ring wearing Reddit user.
I agree.I think we can all agree on here that there are positive social programs that have been done sustainably and correctly. We know the plaudits of the Nordic model.
At the same time history has shown us the rabid version of socialism which shouldn't be condoned. People who've lived under it keep warning us.
Well I was referring to socialists in general but I would never go that far with Muz as the anecdotes of his life show he's worked hard and deserves the fruits of his labour.Sounds about right for that bloke.
He's backed by Elon Musk....
Elon has been paying his legal bills.
One thing about Robinson though. He was right about the grooming gangs scandals in the UK.
Everyone in politics, regardless of whether they were left or right, from the Labour Party to the Tories said it was a racist agenda, collectively...
The authorities completely ignored the claims.
And now everyone is ready for it to be exposed. It's probably one of the biggest scandals in Britain's history.
Thousands of young girls many of them vulnerable children, who have now come forward were groomed into being used as sexual playthings of these groups of men. Rape, sexual violence and abuse.
And many of those men were of Pakistani origin.
You wouldn't become a billionaire because the socialist wouldn't have money to pay you. That is unless they stole from someone else or just borrowed with the intention of never repaying it.
I think there's more in common on the matter anyway. I don't think I'd be referring to anyone on here. The recent weeks have seen some surprising balanced views.Go back and read the capitalism thread. No one is saying any of that.
You're deliberately misrepresenting what's been discussed.
Cough cough erm Epstein filesA disgrace how it was denied and reframed. The same happening in London right now too. The mayor wouldn't know how to answer a question if it kicked him in the head.
![]()
Teenage girls lured into forced sex by gangs in London, BBC finds
Our investigation reveals gangs from a range of ethnic backgrounds are operating widely in the capital, exploiting girls and young women.www.bbc.co.uk
I saw a video by a guy talking about these gags. So I looked at his other videos. Some influencer bro type. All his other videos were him making content as a sex tourist in Venezuela
I thought - you’re as much of a problem as those gangs
I think it may be that Vitali guy who was massive years ago. He goes around baiting men dressed as a hot Russian chick with a high pitched voice and then outs himself near the end. Sometimes he approaches them but there are also numerous ones where he's approached and it's very harrowing where it goes. Hilarious when he outs himself with the deep voice though. I think one or two fancied it though.I saw a video by a guy talking about these gags. So I looked at his other videos. Some influencer bro type. All his other videos were him making content as a sex tourist in Venezuela
I thought - you’re as much of a problem as those gangs
Well there was the fear that stating who was behind the UK rape gangs would be racist or see tension in the community. By not putting pressure on the hand that feeds you in regard to the Epstein files would be identical practice here. I.e, don't out it all, someone could get into trouble.Cough cough erm Epstein files