By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.
Sign Up Now!You support the Redbacks? SACA mistyped in that article that they were playing in the Dean Jones Trophy, the new title for the 50 over comp. Actually come to think of it the Sheffield Shield title should also be updated as Sheffield is named after a cricket loving and wealthy colonial Earl. Hello this is now the 21st Century and The Donald Bradman Shield sounds far more appropriate and is honoring our greatest ever cricketer, not some 19th century aristocrat.https://www.saca.com.au/news/4393905/south-australia-draw-in-the-west
South Australia got a draw in their Sheffield Shield game against Western Australia, posting 215 and 8/394d in reply to their 307 and 6/195. Jake Lehmann top-scored with 96 in the first innings for them, whilst Nathan McSweeney scored 103 off 168 deliveries in the second innings.
I think naming our first class national domestic cricket competition after the greatest sportsperson in human history makes complete sense to me!Who do you support? SACA mistyped in that article that they were playing in the Dean Jones Trophy, which is the 50 over comp. Actually come to think of it the Sheffield Shield title should be updated as Sheffield is named after a colonial figure. Hello this is now the 21st Century and The Donald Bradman Shield sounds far more appropriate and is honoring our greatest ever cricketer, not some 19th century aristocrat.
Fair enough he had a hand in its inception by way of donation/sponsoship, but does that warrant forever having our most prized long form cricket comp named after him? I wouldn't think so. I'm sure Earls of Sheffield haven't done shit for our game for many a year.
Nah we dont want him associated with a Brit colonial/imperial honors award. This is better, Donald Bradman (AC) Shield. AC standing for Companion of the Order of Australia. Or even THE DON (AC) ShieldSir Donald Bradman Shield
Sometimes we don't visit the forum.C'mon guys detest posting alone.
I must admit I perceive men's T20 as almost the enemy of red ball cricket these days! I despise the blaring music in between balls too. One can't hear one's mates next to you!Aussies did it tuff early with the chase but nailed the win comfortably in the end. Some of our fellars dont have the first clue how to play Indian spin, Owen and David the main culprits. Hello. Heard of moving your feet.
I know mate, you have a life, unlike me.Sometimes we don't visit the forum.
I enjoy it far more than 50 over. Agree about the noise, reason I dont attend T20 live anymore. Did Bellerive have the music and stupid fireworks every time a six was hit.I know men's T20 makes cricket the second most popular sport in the world too.
Missed it. Will find a replay hopefully.He didn't impress Richie!
Is this the game you and the guys saw live Jon. You agree with my comments re Abbott and Owen.Needed our bowlers to help out Nathan Ellis 3/36, in the absence of Josh Hazlewood. Abbotts 56 off 3.3 overs, is diobolical. Drop him and likewise Mitch Owen until he learns to use his feet to spin. Seems there is still some life for Stoinis in T20. If we wanna win the series Josh Philippe as our best spin player must be in the remaining two games.
Yes.I enjoy it far more than 50 over. Agree about the noise, reason I dont attend T20 live anymore. Did Bellerive have the music and stupid fireworks every time a six was hit.
No luck, only a piddling 8 mins of footage.Missed it. Will find a replay hopefully.