Welcome!

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.

Sign Up Now!

debate thread for a league v nst/nsl

either, would the NSL been able to provide the coaches & infrastructure to qualify. Players yes no doubt would have qualified, the NSL exceeded, despite such a poor infrastructure, they produced our GG, but they had no money.
Probably yes if asia has 4.5 places. Even playing 5th placed south american team if we finish fifth is a lot more doable if u have a battle hardened team. Probably would make top four in asia from 92 onwards, not sure about before that
 
Probably yes if asia has 4.5 places. Even playing 5th placed south american team if we finish fifth is a lot more doable if u have a battle hardened team. Probably would make top four in asia from 92 onwards, not sure about before that
Didn't we lose to an Asian team Iran, in 1997, the 5th best team in Asia that year,
 
Didn't we lose to an Asian team Iran, in 1997, the 5th best team in Asia that year,
Yes but without 18 meaningful games leading up to that that we get through the current qualification system which battle hardens and allows combinations to form, particularly defensive combinations
 
Yes but without 18 meaningful games leading up to that that we get through the current qualification system which battle hardens and allows combinations to form, particularly defensive combinations
You forgetting how hard it was for the SA to get their best players back for qualifiers.

Also forgetting how hard to qualify via Asia, with it's heat & travels, requiring strong infrastructure & battle harden coach
 
You forgetting how hard it was for the SA to get their best players back for qualifiers.

Also forgetting how hard to qualify via Asia, with it's heat & travels, requiring strong infrastructure & battle harden coach
For example, the Asian 2007 cup campaign, we had a battle harden Golden Generation, we lost to teams that were more concerned on getting autographs of our players.
 
Yes but without 18 meaningful games leading up to that that we get through the current qualification system which battle hardens and allows combinations to form, particularly defensive combinations
Apart from South America, who gets to play 18 qualifiers
 
You forgetting how hard it was for the SA to get their best players back for qualifiers.

Also forgetting how hard to qualify via Asia, with it's heat & travels, requiring strong infrastructure & battle harden coach
That heat and travel though in a funny way is what makes it easier, it battle hardens u

Even back in the 74 campaign jonny warren credited the battle hardening

The socceroos would probably not come back to play america samoa today, so i doubt that means they wouldnt have come for oman

Also having rankings based on 10 matches rather than 1 means u arent at the mercy of bad luck
 
That heat and travel though in a funny way is what makes it easier, it battle hardens u

Even back in the 74 campaign jonny warren credited the battle hardening

The socceroos would probably not come back to play america samoa today, so i doubt that means they wouldnt have come for oman

Also having rankings based on 10 matches rather than 1 means u arent at the mercy of bad luck
True, but it’s all still determined by who’s better/luckier on the day. Plus we failed to qualify for Argentina ‘78 despite still having some of the WC squad from 4 years prior@ our disposal.

Now this would merit its own thread, but how many of us ever even semi-believed in “the witch-doctor’s curse” that was hexed on our Mexico ‘70 qualification campaign❓
 
That heat and travel though in a funny way is what makes it easier, it battle hardens u

Even back in the 74 campaign jonny warren credited the battle hardening

The socceroos would probably not come back to play america samoa today, so i doubt that means they wouldnt have come for oman

Also having rankings based on 10 matches rather than 1 means u arent at the mercy of bad luck
There is no doubt the more matches gets you battle harden, I agree with you.
But look at the 2014 & 2018 campaigns, we only qualified by the skin of our teeth.
I still don't think under the NSL do we qualify, the infrastructure was poor, you dismiss the Asian qualification route as being easier than the Oceania, while I agree on match hardness, I disagree.
To qualify thru Asia, you need coaches like Guus, Pim, Ange, 2020 Arnie & Poppa & not Farina, 2007 Arnie & the likes & the SA does not have the infrastructure to get coaches like FFA (FA) does.
 
You don't(apparently) belong on here. You have your own hate page in another section that some people are banned from. (ALLEGEDLY)
The NSL finished 21 years ago and the NST is only 1/2 a "season" deep.... Some of you old foggies need to stop living in the past and join the rest of us in 2025.
 
Wasnt a huge difference in performance from our 2001 team under Farina and Hiddink against Uruguay in 2005 respectively. We won both home legs 1-0 with the difference being that Schwarzer saved us in Montevideo in 05. We got lucky in a penalty shootout eventually but ultimately it was luck, in 2001 we had chances early in the 2nd leg to put Uruguay to bed but couldnt capitalise.

All things considered we should have gone have to Korea/Japan and absolutely should have gone to France 98.
 
Wasnt a huge difference in performance from our 2001 team under Farina and Hiddink against Uruguay in 2005 respectively. We won both home legs 1-0 with the difference being that Schwarzer saved us in Montevideo in 05. We got lucky in a penalty shootout eventually but ultimately it was luck, in 2001 we had chances early in the 2nd leg to put Uruguay to bed but couldnt capitalise.

All things considered we should have gone have to Korea/Japan and absolutely should have gone to France 98.
thought the reffing was the main difference
should have conceded a pen and a red card in 2005 in both the home and away. Some times luck goes your way, sometimes not I guess
 
Back
Top