Welcome!

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.

Sign Up Now!

World news and politics.

Muz said:
At the end of the day, if some bloke wants to wear a dress or if 2 people want to wear a rabbit and cat costume and fuck and it's between consenting adults who give a shit?

Back in the day you'd go, what a weirdo and move on.

Now blokes like Beretta want them sanctioned and put in an asylum.

What a tolerant lad.
Click to expand...

who said i was tolerant?

an Asylum is the easy way out.
 
Muz said:
And also. You might argue that it is not 'perfectly biological normal' but are you saying they are 'mentally ill'? Scrub that, I know you're not. I'm arguing with people, who with complete confidence, say trans people are mentally ill. And worse than that, Beretta suggested, months ago, homosexuals were in the same camp.
Click to expand...

Apologies if i cant keep up with your daily post count like Mono.

But you should know my answer to that question.
 
NoMates said:
Its a sad day when someone cant debate options on different views without being killed for it. Fk the left they make me sick.
Click to expand...
Because until now, all the school shootings, the killing of the democratic rep Hortman, attempted assassination of dem rep Gliffords, and the storming of the capital, were all very normal and nothing sad about them.
 
zimbos05 said:
The video is not cut. Camera angles are adjusted, but not cut
Click to expand...
What's the definition of cut here? You can see there are snippets put together. It's not one single camera roll. The message of the video isn't changed all that much but it was in reference to a murderer and now framed to mean all homeless people.
 
Muz said:
Exactly. People are sacked for saying they don't have sympathy for Kirk and this bloke still has a job. Go figure.

And so much for 'selective editing' as was claimed.
Click to expand...
Surely you can see the audio comes in snippets? That's not to say the message has been overly changed but it's gone from a discussion about a murderer to being framed as all homeless people. Again, his reference to 'them' shows it's not referring to the individual at the start of their talk.
 
JS96 said:
What's the definition of cut here? You can see there are snippets put together. It's not one single camera roll. The message of the video isn't changed all that much but it was in reference to a murderer and now framed to mean all homeless people.
Click to expand...
Not cut means it's not two clips put together. I watched the original clip, and then went and rewatched it to verify, and it's exactly like it came across. He says what he says. He says, "kill them". The key word there is "them" as in collective
 
zimbos05 said:
Not cut means it's not two clips put together. I watched the original clip, and then went and rewatched it to verify, and it's exactly like it came across. He says what he says. He says, "kill them". The key word there is "them" as in collective
Click to expand...
Right, I see. The final statement was added to the end. There was a bit of chat between the opening and ending. Regardless it does enough to keep the core message. The bloke should be fired as anyone who can say that then try to claim he was referring to the death penalty for the single murder case is simply lying. Fox won't care though as this stuff probably increases their viewership.
 
JS96 said:
Surely you can see the audio comes in snippets? That's not to say the message has been overly changed but it's gone from a discussion about a murderer to being framed as all homeless people. Again, his reference to 'them' shows it's not referring to the individual at the start of their talk.
Click to expand...

Then why is he apologising?
 
Beretta said:
Apologies if i cant keep up with your daily post count like Mono.

But you should know my answer to that question.
Click to expand...

Apologies if I missed it. Care to make your views known publicly?
 
Muz said:
Then why is he apologising?
Click to expand...
I went from discussing a murderer to murderers to homelessness. He felt his final comment would be a reference to the first topic but it was all stupid to begin with and the network felt it was best to clarify it. He shouldn't be in at work tomorrow.
 
JS96 said:
Right, I see. The final statement was added to the end. There was a bit of chat between the opening and ending. Regardless it does enough to keep the core message. The bloke should be fired as anyone who can say that then try to claim he was referring to the death penalty for the single murder case is simply lying. Fox won't care though as this stuff probably increases their viewership.
Click to expand...
The only bit of chatter in between was her saying, "what do you think".

What he said is indefensible. Whether he was speaking about the one guy or all of them, advocating for death is horrible.
 
zimbos05 said:
The only bit of chatter in between was her saying, "what do you think".

What he said is indefensible. Whether he was speaking about the one guy or all of them, advocating for death is horrible.
Click to expand...
Plenty of people on this forum don't see eye to eye, have different opinions and debate it. It doesn't call for people to be murdered because of someone's views differs to another.
 
Bit late to this debate, but its truly sad when connecting and attempting respectful conversation with people who have differing views results in a bullet to the throat. I've always enjoyed Charlie's videos and his ability to disarm his opponents through a mastery of language and research, despite some of the vitriol and mischaracterizations thrown at him by the unhinged. He loved his family, his country and his religion. Really can't see how you can resent him for that. Hopefully his death isn't totally pointless and this can be the catalyst for a 'turning point' for our species away from such extremist rhetoric and back to respectful dialogue.

Anyone celebrating his death is an evil piece of shit, regardless of politics or bias.
 
NoMates said:
Plenty of people on this forum don't see eye to eye, have different opinions and debate it. It doesn't call for people to be murdered because of someone's views differs to another.
Click to expand...
Totally agree.

Just stop pretending like it's all the left's fault.
 
NoMates said:
Plenty of people on this forum don't see eye to eye, have different opinions and debate it. It doesn't call for people to be murdered because of someone's views differs to another.
Click to expand...

What about advocating for harm or murder for trans people?

I'm more than happy to edit this if Beretta cares to explain what he means by 'an asylum is the easy way out'. Perhaps he means foster care or some such.


1757921878845.png
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top