- Thread Author
- #201
Excellent summary, Mr C.I've spoken to Lawrie McKinna at length about this. He would have better insight than most re the relative merits of the SPFL and the AL.
His view is that the conditions of both countries are too different to properly rate the leagues... Scottish teams who come here for friendlies just about always lose on our hard hot pitches. But if an Australian team went to Scotland to play a friendly they would struggle.
If a fair time and place could be found to play all AL teams against all SPFL teams then LM believes the AL boys would win most of the matches as the range of quality is much greater in Scotland than it is in Oz.
In summary, the SPFL (according to LM) is comparable (if not inferior) to the AL - especially once you remove Celtic and Rangers from the equation. But what makes the SPFL attractive to Australians (and it's only second tier Australians who go there) is the chance to play in a football obsessed culture, make slightly more money and put themselves in the Euro shop window.
What makes the football different is the cold weather and soft pitches (as opposed to the baking sun and hard pitches of the summer AL). Scottish football, in the cold, is far faster than AL football so decisions have to be made quicker and skills must be developed in order to cope).
When I’ve watched it outside Celtic and Rangers, the other teams lose the ball quickly, because the ball carriers aren’t supported proactively, by their teammates opening angled passing lanes - like when watching Serie A and even the AL.
In Scotland the ball is in the transitions a lot, or Contested Ball Phase, not clear possession for one team or the other.
Other good examples are many of the teams in the WC, who support the ball carrier well, hence the better teams being able to sustain longer spells of possession.
Laurie McKinna was supposedly the best man manager, or player manager, of all the AL coaches.