If they go off, the ref picks whoever’s closestAnd if they're injured having just been fouled?
By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.
Sign Up Now!If they go off, the ref picks whoever’s closestAnd if they're injured having just been fouled?
If they go off, the ref picks whoever’s closest
Its an interetsing idea... To your point though, corners, goalkicks and throw ins aren't really fouls...Interesting but I don't think that's rule that needs changing. What's the rationale?
Your best kicker takes the corners and goalkicks, the throw-ins are usually taken by the backs or somebody that can launch it.
If you're changing the rule as you say then they'll be saying what about XYZ.
was a t a match years ago where the facing wind was so strong the ball kept on blowing back over the players head.....Also, if you take a throw in and it doesn't go in, it goes to the opposition. If you're such a gumby that you can't stand facing the field and still fuck it up then you don't deserve another go.
Two reasons. First one is so every player has to work on those skills and the second is so players can’t stat pad from set-piecesInteresting but I don't think that's rule that needs changing. What's the rationale?
Your best kicker takes the corners and goalkicks, the throw-ins are usually taken by the backs or somebody that can launch it.
If you're changing the rule as you say then they'll be saying what about XYZ.
I hear about this and I always think and laugh at the hypothetical I gave an NRL Ref Academy mate of mine at uni:was a t a match years ago where the facing wind was so strong the ball kept on blowing back over the players head.....
Its an interetsing idea... To your point though, corners, goalkicks and throw ins aren't really fouls...
Granted what you say but bear in mind that the "opportunity" wasted was base don a foul on a particular player... anyway mate just spitballing, totally agree that that it is of minimal importance, just an interesting thought exercise.It's an extension of the same principle but besides penalties, which can inflate a player's stats, why other fouls?
The defending team drags an attacker down outside the box and now the ref allows a wall and time get all the defenders back to organise the defence and now we're saying 'sorry your set piece bloke can't take it'. In which case all the advantages lie with the defending side that committed the foul.
Nope, you've disadvantaged the attacking side by bringing him down within shooting distance, suffer the consequences.
There's better low hanging fruit.
Maybe. If the NSL/Soccer Australia needed the qualification money that bad then I wouldn't use the word 'thriving' that's for sure, more like a temporary stay of execution.One bloke said the NSL would have thrived had Australia qualified for WC 2002.
I've always wondered how the dynamic of the game would change if a yellow card meant a player was also sent off for 5 minutes. Would it reduce professional fouls? Would it stop time-wasting keepers? Imagine a really heated game, you could see both teams go down to 7-8 players for 5 mins.
There are way too many law changes all the time. It's screwing up the game. No need to change anything more going forward, except get rid of VAR (if only). If you get rid of VAR you get rid of all the offside issues (big toe, accuracy of lines, etc) because it all comes down to the lino's instantaneous view of whether the attacker was past the defender, as it has been for the the last however many years before VAR came in.
I think the most recent law change of 8 seconds for the keeper now has that aspect of the game sorted out, no need to change anything else.
I would tell Arsene Wenger and whoever else FIFA/IFAB have looking at law changes to fuck off for a few years.
not just in Masters also O55's in regular comp I've played in last season. )so I expect its got introduced elsewhere aas the old leagues keep expanding)In masters football here and in Brisbane it's a yellow and 10 in the bin if it's a slide tackle. (Protect the old blokes you see.)
As a result there's very few slide tackles.
To protect the whimps/whingers and lesser players depending the Div.
they do this in O35's up there eh....
I do not recall all my years playing O35 1/s that rule applied, infact it didn't and I played that level just on at 50yrs.
Then I accepted I can't keep up with 35yr old up and comers.
45's didn't have no slide rule for my forwarding mature years.
Alot of my team mates accpeted going O55's season before last, thats when no slide rule came in.
Yes I agree we're not playing for sheep stations and we all got to work Monday, I reckon Div 1 open rules should still apply, get it when your out just to have fun and all very much.
Yep, I agree with all this, that's why I said no need to change anything more. I think the laws as they are now are good, as you said those little management issues have been sorted. And I think (hope) the goalkeeper holding on to the ball too long has been fixed with this latest change.Fair enough but to stick up for IFAB here most of the rule tweaks have been fairly sensible of late.
One person at kickoff if you want, players don't have to be out of the box for goalkicks, attackers to be one metre away from a wall, dropped ball if it hits the ref, no contested drop balls and other little management issues.
Luv to attend more Masters but making the time is damn hard !
Did one some years back at the Goldy and before when held in Syd.
Hoot of a time - imagine going to one in France or Italy etc, be a mess of a boys trip hahaha
All - well some would end up so smashed, divorced etc omg