You want to go head to head we take on the weaker links links like rugby first, this is the easier beat, but to do that you begin by overhauling everything in football from the ground up. No more prioritising the so called "main stream", FA do a carpet survey of all football stakeholders as a whole and equally, engage actual professionals of how to set up a new structure encompassing all things football, FA to control all again (bring in experts from European FA's to do it) no more ex rugby muppets politicians etc at helm of our sport, no closed leagues, no exlcuded clubs, full focus on growing grass roots as opposed to a pro league and push push push the international exposure (which cricket does correctly), you get the ground up working well and the rest falls in line.. simple. Thats the pipe dream and wishful thinking..
The reality:
We cant even agree,support,accept a 2nd tier (new dawners continue to still argue to exclude effniks for the sake of those that dont have an interest in our game), and thats a fully internal issue, so no need blame the other codes for those shortcomings!
General observation remains that those crying most foul about the afl strength etc are the ones that are pro exclusion in our game in the first place.. no different to that which they hypocritically berate when it comes to themselves.... no doubt that even of they got the sway/power it wouldnt be that they would use it for the benefit of the game as a whole, but their own league alone..
With all this in mind, and until our own house is in order, why would i care who has the power as a supporter/proponent of the lower leagues, especially when it doesnt benefit me in the least, and given i have no stakeholder status overall?