Welcome!

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.

Sign Up Now!

Green & Gold FC podcast

There's big money in football pod/video casting and it won't be long before the G & G podcast is being chased by the big podcasting conglomerates.....

Neville buys YouTuber’s channels

Matt Lawton - Chief Sports Correspondent

Gary Neville has expanded his media business with the purchase of the Manchester United influencer Mark Goldbridge’s YouTube channels in what is understood to be a seven-figure deal.

Goldbridge, a former police officer whose real name is Brent Di Cesare, has acquired more than 3.7 million subscribers across his channels with his often explosive rants about United’s performances.

His business, which features the shows The United Stand and That’s Football, has now been acquired by the Neville-led The Overlap for an undisclosed amount.

In a statement issued yesterday morning, The Overlap said it is seeking to build “one of the most exciting football communities in the world”.

Goldbridge will continue to front both channels as part of “a significant expansion” of Neville’s growing media empire.

The United Stand will be extended to include a new show called Stick to United, which will feature former players and journalists.

There will also be something called The Daily United, which will provide news on Neville’s former club. Other major clubs across Europe will also be targeted in The Overlap’s latest expansion.

Neville, 51, who is the executive director of The Overlap, said: “We are building what we believe will become one of the most exciting independent football communities in the world — one that gives fans direct, personality-led content.”

Goldbridge said that the deal would allow him to “take what I do to the next level”.

This deal follows the news in January that Global, the major commercial radio company, had acquired a majority stake in The Overlap, initially a football podcast and YouTube channel that has expanded to become a media business covering several sports.

In August last year Goldbridge won the rights to stream 20 Bundesliga games.

It was the first time an online content creator had been included in such a deal.

How much Grazor?

$1m maybe $2m???
 

Finally caught up with this one, fascinating chat fellas, well done. Very interesting about the FIFA clearing house, I have heard it spoken about around the club and agree with James and the original JJ James that better governance and club administration is one of the pillars of growth we could use to improve our game from bottom to top. Refreshing to hear someone NOT wanting to scrap the member federations but agree that they ALL need to be singing from the same hymn book. One of, at least I think, James's key messages to take away from your chat was that while the whole world views the clubs as the driver of both football and commercial growth, we rely on the national teams.....
 
Finally caught up with this one, fascinating chat fellas, well done. Very interesting about the FIFA clearing house, I have heard it spoken about around the club and agree with James and the original JJ James that better governance and club administration is one of the pillars of growth we could use to improve our game from bottom to top. Refreshing to hear someone NOT wanting to scrap the member federations but agree that they ALL need to be singing from the same hymn book. One of, at least I think, James's key messages to take away from your chat was that while the whole world views the clubs as the driver of both football and commercial growth, we rely on the national teams.....
Yeah i couldnt figure out why getting rid of the mfs was the obvious thing to do, seems to be a preferred reform of simon hill

The mfs should ideally bring more priority to the grassroots. The fact that they dont is interesting and looking under the hood i can see why, the mfs need reform. Football victoria reformed and so far the results look promising
 
Yeah i couldnt figure out why getting rid of the mfs was the obvious thing to do, seems to be a preferred reform of simon hill

The mfs should ideally bring more priority to the grassroots. The fact that they dont is interesting and looking under the hood i can see why, the mfs need reform. Football victoria reformed and so far the results look promising
The jury is still deliberating in VIC... Clubs were screaming for real representation for years and now things seem to have gone quiet.. AT least there doesnt appear to be that same old nepotism at the top we had with the Oakleigh GMs wife running he federation in years gone past...
 
The jury is still deliberating in VIC... Clubs were screaming for real representation for years and now things seem to have gone quiet.. AT least there doesnt appear to be that same old nepotism at the top we had with the Oakleigh GMs wife running he federation in years gone past...
What are the red flags about the new system out of curiosity?

Am i right in thinking that the old system was a zone system like nsw where clubs voted for zone members who would nominate and vote for the board? This apparently makes it very difficult for the grassroots to hold the board accountable
 
What are the red flags about the new system out of curiosity?

Am i right in thinking that the old system was a zone system like nsw where clubs voted for zone members who would nominate and vote for the board? This apparently makes it very difficult for the grassroots to hold the board accountable
I dont think there are real red flags, at least that I have heard... A few grumblings about league structure and requirements, player registration etc etc. Im not entirely sure how the old system was structured, but from reports it was extremeny difficult to break certain "voting blocks" of clubs and the voerall feel was of many hands pulling in differnt directions.

An immediate outcome of reform I can see, just as a fan, is the clarity around the fact the next 3 NPL VIC senior men's grand finals will be played At Lakeside stadium... 2 years ago we were finding out finals venues 48 hours before kickoff....
 
I dont think there are real red flags, at least that I have heard... A few grumblings about league structure and requirements, player registration etc etc. Im not entirely sure how the old system was structured, but from reports it was extremeny difficult to break certain "voting blocks" of clubs and the voerall feel was of many hands pulling in differnt directions.

An immediate outcome of reform I can see, just as a fan, is the clarity around the fact the next 3 NPL VIC senior men's grand finals will be played At Lakeside stadium... 2 years ago we were finding out finals venues 48 hours before kickoff....
That is interesting that the zone system created voting blocks. It makes sense in a way, because if your club doesn't like a system in a zone system, their only accountability option is to try and lobby for someone else to be elected zone leader. But it is probably hard to direct the board that way, compared to just voting for board members directly and assessing their performance

Crawford wanted an even more direct democracy where grassroots voters vote for the board
 
Terrific Podcast with James ? the Director with FIFA!

Not sure what criteria are used, or who exactly decides on the guests, but the Podcasts have had some wonderful, knowledgeable football stakeholders in the game!

I'm going out, but will post some questions/comments later.
 
Terrific Podcast with James ? the Director with FIFA!

Not sure what criteria are used, or who exactly decides on the guests, but the Podcasts have had some wonderful, knowledgeable football stakeholders in the game!

I'm going out, but will post some questions/comments later.
I just go off vibes to choose guests, i start with what question im curious about and then figure out a guest
 
#55 was another awesome listen. I really enjoy @scout_aussie input and views. I do like the focus of working with the system we have to improve development. Not because the other stuff (pro-rel etc.) isn't important. But because it's important to put some focus on things we have more control over. Bonus I got to mow the lawn and chop down a tree while I listened. Gardening in the tropics ...
 
#55 was another awesome listen. I really enjoy @scout_aussie input and views. I do like the focus of working with the system we have to improve development. Not because the other stuff (pro-rel etc.) isn't important. But because it's important to put some focus on things we have more control over. Bonus I got to mow the lawn and chop down a tree while I listened. Gardening in the tropics ...
crazy going from cairns where I had to mow the lawns 1 or 2 times a week to england where it needs mowing once a year haha
 
I just go off vibes to choose guests, i start with what question im curious about and then figure out a guest
It is working very well.

My knowledge has broadened a lot since listening to the G and G Podcasts.

The first point that James, the FIFA Director, made in that Podcast, is that football generates more interest than the revenue it raises. At best some years ago, Melb Vic made a slight profit in one very good AL season.

James said it is the owners who then have to foot the bill.

Not sure how Barca, Real Madrid, Man U go in terms of profit/loss?
 
A point James made is that according to the ACL, Aus is ranked about 10th - 12th in Asia. He contends we should be better. Fair comment.

What he didn't mention is that when Melb City played Burinam, and I think there was a Johore club from Malaysia who played either Mac or Melb City, they had almost a full team of imports, usually older, seasoned pros from UEFA or South America, even Aus. To an extent some ACL games for Aus clubs are like playing UEFA/South A opposition. There were some very hard, gritty match football fixtures played under great pressure by Melb City in particular.

Conversely, the AL teams put out almost an entire team of domestic players, with Melb City often playing plenty of youth. Mac played less youth, but few imports.

Those ACL scenarios surely advantage Aus in terms of the national team? I'm sure Japan's JL teams play a greater proportion of domestic players?

Another national team, Qatar, supposedly plays heaps of players with dubious national Qatari credentials.

China in the recent past have done well in the ACL. They have had good imports. One year their Guangzhou Evergrande came third in the world club champs, behind UEFA and South A. Yet their relatively strong domestic league, CL, hasn't extrapolated to Chinese national team success. China could possibly be ranked higher than Aus in Asia?

Another point that was occurring in the initial stages of the Asian sojourn for Aus, was that Kuwait wanted Aus kicked out of Asia. If Aus were to dominate, including AL clubs doing much better in the ACL, this could resurface.

Being in Asia has been very good for Aus football compared to Oceania. To qualify for 6 World Cups in a row is extraordinary. A good mate of mine who travels to Germany a bit, says Germans are constantly impressed about Aus constantly qualifying for 6 WCs in a row.
 
Last edited:
It was interesting to hear James speak about the Transfer Market.

He maintains Aus are being ripped off in transfer fees. He contends that when he speaks to other feds/clubs abroad, they think Aus is a nice cheap transfer market for players. James elucidates that Riley McGree aged 17 went for very little money to a mid - ranking Belgian club, Club Brugge, for peanuts. That a player of his then status, one of the bright young stars of the AL, should have gone for a lot more money.

James also contends that Nestory Iran should have gone for an 8 figure fee. He argues if Iran had been in Finland, Denmark, he would have had a huge transfer fee in comparison. James considers Aus clubs don't understand the Transfer Market, whilst many other Asian clubs in other Asian feds do.

Years ago, then Football Aus Tech Dir, Han Berger, suggested Aus football would start to make money out of healthy transfer fees to UEFA clubs in the future from improved coaching methodology. It hasn't happened to the extent it should have.
 
In the James FIFA Director Podcast, Alex ( posts as Ali here?) and Grazor, posed some very good questions to James for him to shed light in his areas of expertise. It made for a very informative Podcast.

However, I wish Alex would pay more attention to analysing players, teams, coaches, etc, having grey areas. So much for Alex is unequivocally, good or bad. As a semi-pro coach he would have to analyse the players he coaches having strengths and weaknesses, and devising plans to improve the weaknesses.

Love Alex's love for the game - knowledge of global club scenarios, Aussies Abroad, great passion, friendly demeanour, humour, constant disappointment for Perth Glory and Italy! Alex also poses some thoughtful questions to draw the guests out in their areas of expertise.

Grazor is becoming the consummate host. Possibly because of his academic background, he poses thoughtful questions that draw the guests out, and nearly always has sources for data, changing trends according to data/stats, comparisons between leagues, evolving tactics, new trends, also advancing back up data to support his views.
 
#55 was another awesome listen. I really enjoy @scout_aussie input and views. I do like the focus of working with the system we have to improve development. Not because the other stuff (pro-rel etc.) isn't important. But because it's important to put some focus on things we have more control over. Bonus I got to mow the lawn and chop down a tree while I listened. Gardening in the tropics ...
Feel sorry for you gardening in the tropics, Q! Too hot!

I mainly iron whilst I listen to the Pods.

Have this Pod, Aussie Scout number 55, to look forward to.
 
Back
Top