BA81
Key Player
- Joined
- Oct 24, 2024
- Replies
- 812
Lately I’ve gotten to wondering what if ‘reform’ had merely been (off-field)permanently blacklisting the individual bureaucrats who’d bled the game dry for their own kleptocratic ends ie. Tony Labbozzetta and (on-field)creating new expansion clubs for the NSL..but wait for it..I know it's hard to go back in time but what world if they kept the same structures in place instead of starting again with the old soccer/new football tag?
I feel the Crawford report as much was needed it the interpretation was probably wrong that we need new clubs to replace them when actually we need the foundation to evolve allowing the best of both worlds to happen without scarifying the youth development structures which underpin the national league and national teams? It was kind of crazy that it took 10 years for a-league teams to start having academy sides when they should have had it as part of entering into the a-league era after all that's how football leagues operate.
..instead of being ‘broadbased’ franchises cooked up to aesthetically appeal to ‘the mainstream’, they would’ve been *mono-ethnic* clubs created to represent (some of)the later migrant-communities that for w/ever reason had never been actively courted by the NSL or lower-tier domestic
The closest there came to fruition was the ‘Melbourne Dragons’ bid back in late-‘02 which as the name implies would’ve primarily set out to appeal to East Asian communities, and IIRC was@ one point lobbying in conjunction w/an NBL expansion-side(which obv didn’t come to fruition either)