By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.
Sign Up Now!Only 1 big innings in 2 years.Haha, if only you knew how wrong that statement is.
Ussie scored 232 against Sri Lanka in Jan. Would you say that didn't earn him the right to continue the year? Granted he didn't perform to that standard much throughout, but which opener was putting their hand up and staking a claim? Even looking at Manus's numbers, he should have been dropped much earlier. Trav has been mediocre coming into the Ashes. Inglis has one good innings.
There are so many you could say didn't "earn" their spot, yet they performed when needed. So should we have replaced those places? What about our spin options? Why do they refuse to replace Lyon?
You keep making out like I'm insistent that Ussie should have played every game. I've already said that I thought Ussie should have retired earlier, but it was obvious he wanted to go out in an Ashes series and he earned the right to do so. He hasn't had the best Ashes, but he also hasn't been the worst.
Calling for Green to get back to 100% fitness and to play shield cricket is being proactive. It means I'm interested in his development and performance, as opposed to just continuing to let him play without any form of measure. Constantly picking him regardless is the definition of emotional.
Smith is the better tactically and Cummins probably a better leader of men. Both have about same 60% win percentage.I don’t like Smith as Captain at all.
Not the right body language. Also, a ball tamperer. Bad look for Captain, but a great senior player with great tactical acumen.
Cummins and Paine have/had terrific body language. Both have used Smith’s tactical brain too.
I’d like Head or Carey as stand in Captain.
Webster now averages 41 with the bat after 8 Tests with five 50s, many played on sticky wickets overseas.
Higher average than Usman, Labu, Weathers, Warner and Green over the last few years. Do the selectors have any concept of simple data and basic maths?
Smith was aware. Didn’t want to know the details of the ball tampering. He was weak not stopping it.Smith is the better tactically and Cummins probably a better leader of men. Both have about same 60% win percentage.
Also let's make sure we don't forget that Smith didn't commit any ball tampering...he was only guilty of being the captain at the time and unaware of the actions of his players.
Nice to win after the last 3 very tough home series against India.How Sweet it is Baggies. Yet another home series!!![]()
![]()
![]()
Come on man. You're being completely unfair. he has some decent contributions in that time. We just saw one in Adelaide. Don't recall Green doing anything significant this series.Only 1 big innings in 2 years.
It was a big score. Usman batted very, very well.
Outside it he has struggled in the last 2 years.
Test batting average of 25 in 2024.
36 average in 2024 - so poor outside the 1 superb double century in SL.
His eyesight is declining and it takes him longer to play himself in.
My take is tho three of the five games had bowler friendly pitches Starc stood up in the absence of his two long time pace bowling buddies when it was most needed. Fair to say he benefited from their absence as they w'd've definitely shared in his massive wicket haul, specially in Perth and Brissie. So really Mitch can thank those two blokes most for his second series gong on the trot..Who was your player of the series?
Starc
Head
Carey
Why?