IMO Webster is more reilable and consistent and the fact that he can bowl lots of tight overs covers a lot of bases.
Green's best is definately better than Webster's best, but Green is patchy and inconsistent. I think Green will come good, and may play a role similar to Stokes in future, i just wonder how to get there,
Perhaps there is room for both in the side and that will improve the fielding.
Adelaide would have been the ideal game to play Webster and perhaps 2 spinners will be handy in Sydney.
Melboure might offer more assitance to pace bowlers and Green might be more handy.
If a wicket has swing and seam sometimes an accurate bowler can be effective. Jimmy Anderson was pretty slow at the end of his career.
If will be funny if the poms bowl 140+ and we beat them with 120-130 swing and seam.
So far we haven't had a pitch with a lot of swing and seam or reverse swing. Inconsistent bounce and lots of bounce has been the main threat.