patjennings
Vice Captain
- Joined
- Oct 18, 2024
- Replies
- 1,779
I don't think the point can still stand if you think people are after mansions. A bit unfair to blame people buying for the actions of the developer. If a package is being offered, people go with whats offered. I think that points to how housing has become a commodity seen as a way to make money rather a human right. Developers offer packages that don't necessarily meet the requirement, but then people have to go with that option or have nothing.
Obviously can't compare what was available then with now. In saying that, even if people bought those houses back then, they were earning enough to do the renovations the way they want. Now, you buy a house - even a run down one - and you are basically going to struggle to do it up because of the extreme cost of housing, the stagnation of wages, the giveaway of our resources, and the selling out to corporate donors.
I know that last part simplifies it a bit, but it's an easy way to understand.
Some good points - but all three of my kids have gone for the older ones or the smaller established ones. One is a tradie, and having a lot of tradie mates certainly helps.