One thing our Aus TV analysts have not paid enough attention to, is how the opposotion has forced Aus to play a certain way. Our opponents, Turkey, USA and Paraguay have dictated how Aus plays. They have focused too much on Aus playing - as though the tactics of the opposition have had no impact.
Harry Kewell appears to be a better former player than coach, in terms of analysis. Milligan is more analytical, more observant and will probably go further as a coach.
Consider this:
* Against Turkey they committed a lot of players forwards, often 8-9 players into the Aus half to Gegenpress, or Full Press and intensively Squeeze. Aus was often trying to play out from the back, with very well co-ordinated Full Pressing and Squeezing from Turkey.
However, Turkey got caught out just a few times, by ceding space in between the midfield line and defensive line, or in between their defensive line and keeper. This lost them the game.
* Against the USA, the Americans also did the same as Turkey, but better. There were often 8-9 US players in the Aus defensive half, again, trying to disturb our build ups from the back. The difference was the USA, were more aware of Aus's occasional accelerated attacks, had a more aware defensive line, and left slightly smaller holes in between lines.
Credit to the USA in the 90 mins against Paraguay and first 45 mins against Aus. They displayed how to blow strong, compact, organised defences off the park.
In these 2 games, Aus players often had far less time and space on the ball. I don't think the former Roos, now pundits, paid enough attention to this.
* Paraguay, only occasionally Full Pressed and Squeezed intensively in the Aus defensive half. They did at times on both flanks force Aus to defend deep with Roos having body shape facing backwards - BUT - after a few seconds, Paraguay quickly regained their defensive shape - like Popa's Roos. Their primary focus was having a deep defence, playing 5 at the back, because of the extreme pace and ball carrying ability of Irank, Bos and Toure in previous games.
Consequently, Aus players had more time on the ball in midfield, because Para didn't want to risk their defensive shape with the ball being anything less than compact, and deep, by playing a far deeper defensive line. Roos received a lot more ball with body position facing forwards against Paraguay. Para in turn implemented Half Presses and Partial Presses, with only moderate Squeezing intensity, most of the time.
This wasn't a game of action, which Sunderland Bear, and others, desperately want to see in football. It was a tense, tactical battle.
At the same time, I can' t see teams like Aus or Paraguay going a long way in the WC, as they lack the ability to dominate, through lack of the innate skill needed to win WCs.
Both have a lot more mental strength than the fragile Dutch though. For all the Dutch's technique and tactical nous, Dutch body language was poor in the extra time against Morocco. Heads dropped.
Dutch coaches have liked coaching Aus players, who have vast mental strength, commitment to the team cause and unity of purpose compared to the Dutch - often their weakness.